Partner Choices in Long Established Migrant Communities in Belgium
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51964/hlcs9337Keywords:
Patterns, Multinomial multilevel, Transnational marriages, Partner choices, Belgium, Migrant origin, Migration history, ImmigrantsAbstract
This paper aims to shed light on the partner choices of Moroccan, Turkish, Congolese, and Algerian migrants in Belgium. Three partner choices are distinguished: marrying a partner from the country of origin (partner migration), marrying a local co-ethnic partner, and establishing a mixed marriage. We focused on the role of migration history and transnational links, culture (religion, language), skin colour and structural characteristics of the district migrants live in (mainly community size) to gain further insight into the partner choices of migrants in Belgium. Our data comprise an extraction of the Belgian national register (2001-2008) and focus on first marriages among first, 1.5, and second generation migrants of Moroccan, Turkish, Algerian, and Congolese origin (N=52,142). We apply a multinomial logistic multilevel design to simultaneously incorporate individual and contextual effects at the district level. The main conclusion from this paper is that the partner selection pattern in early 21st century Belgian society still bears the traces of the starting conditions that migrant groups experienced when they first entered the country. While this continuity is important to understand the situation citizens with a migrant origin have to deal with today, it does not make change impossible. In fact, for the Turkish and Moroccan group, research recently showed a quite strong decline in transnational marriages and a modest increase in mixed marriages. These are indications that after 50 years of migration a transition towards full inclusion in Belgian society is not beyond reach. The conditions analysed in this paper, namely the strength of transnational networks, the cultural boundaries and the ethnic community size, may help to understand why this inclusion takes such a long period of time.
Downloads
References
Alba, R. (2005). Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 20-49. DOI: 10.1080/0141987042000280003
Alba, E. & Nee, V. (1997). Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration. International Migration Review, 31(4), 338-351. DOI: 10.2307/2547416
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Amin, A. & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities and ethnicities: Introduction. Ethnicities, 2(3), 291-300 DOI: 10.1177/14687968020020030101
Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2007). Transnational lives, transnational marriages: A review of the evidence from migrant communities in Europe. Global Networks, 7, 271-288. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2007.00169
Blau, P. M. (1994). Structural context of opportunities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: The Free Press.
Buzar, S., Ogden P., Hall, R., Haase, A., Kabisch, S. & Steinführer, A. (2007). Splintering urban populations: Emergent landscapes of reurbanisation in four European cities. Urban Studies, 44(4), 651-677. DOI: 10.1080/00420980601185544
Caestecker, F. (2011). Migration from and into Belgium and Luxemburg (17th – 20th century). In: K. Bade, P. Emmer, L. Lucassen, & J. Oltmer (Eds.), The encyclopedia of European migration and minorities, from the seventeenth century to the present (pp. 44 – 51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caestecker F. & Rea, A. (2009). Migreren voor een diploma, studenten van buiten de Europese Unieaan het Belgisch Hoger Onderwijs. Leuven: Acco.
Carol, S., Ersanilli, E. & Wagner, M. (2014). Spousal choice among the children of Turkish and Moroccan immigrants in six European countries: Transnational spouse or co-ethnic migrant? International Migration Review, 48(2), 387-414. DOI: 10.1111/imre.12068
Centre de Recherche en démographie et sociétés (DEMO), Université Catholique de Louvain & Centrum voor Gelijkheid van Kansen en voor Racismebestrijding (CGKR). (2013). Migraties en migrantenpopulaties in België. Statistisch en demografisch verslag 2013.
CIA World Factbook (2015). Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov.
Coleman, D.A. (1994). Trends in fertility and intermarriage among immigrant populations in Western Europe as measures of integration. Journal of Biosocial Science, 26(1), 107-136. DOI: 10.1017/S0021932000021106
De Bock, J. (2012). Alle wegen leiden naar Gent. Trajecten van mediterrane migranten naar de Arteveldestad, 1960-1980. Brood & Rozen: Tijdschrift voor de geschiedenis van sociale bewegingen, 3, 47-75. Handle: 1814/25635
Dribe, M. & Lundh, C. (2011). Cultural dissimilarity and intermarriage. A longitudinal study of immigrants in Sweden 1990–20051. International Migration Review, 45(2), 297-324. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2011.00849
Eggerickx, T., Kesteloot, C., Poulain, M., Pelemans, K., Roesems, T. & Vandenbroecke, H. (1999). De allochtone bevolking in België. Algemene Volks- en Woningtelling op 1 maart 1991, Brussel: NIS.
Eurobarometer (2006). Europeans and their languages. Special Eurobarometer 243. Brussels: European Commission.
Gonzalez-Ferrer, A. (2006). Why do immigrants marry? Partner choice among single immigrants in Germany. European Sociological Review, 22, 171-185. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3559575
Hoekstra, M. (2015). Diverse cities and good citizenship: How local governments in the Netherlands recast national integration discourse. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(10), 1798-1814. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2015.1015585
Hooghiemstra, E. (2003). Trouwen over de grens. Achtergronden van partnerkeuze van Turken en Marokkanen in Nederland. Den Haag: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau.
Hooghiemstra, E. (2001). Migrants, partner selection and integration: Crossing borders? Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32(4), 601-626. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41603781
Kalmijn, M. & van Tubergen, F. (2006). Ethnic intermarriage in the Netherlands: Confirmations and refutations of accepted insights. European Journal of Population/Revue europeenne de demographie, 22, 371-397. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-006-9105-3
Kalter, F. & Schroedter, J.H. (2010). Transnational marriage among former labour migrants in Germany. Zeitschrift fur Familienforschung, 22(1), 11-36. Handle: 0168/35486
Kulzycki, A. & Lobo, A. P. (2002). Patterns, determinants, and implications of intermarriage among Arab Americans. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 202–210. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00202
Lesthaeghe, R. (2000). Transnational Islamic communities in a multilingual secular society. In: R. Lesthaeghe (Ed.), Communities and generations – Turkish and Moroccan populations in Belgium (pp.1-58). Brussel: VUB Press.
Lesthaeghe, R., Surkyn, J. & Van Craenem, I.J. (2000). Dimensions and determinants of integration-related attitudes among Turkish and Moroccan men in Belgium. In: R. Lesthaeghe (Ed.), Communities and generations – Turkish and Moroccan populations in Belgium (pp. 195-242). Brussels: VUB Press.
Lichter, D., Carmalt, J. & Qian, Z. (2011). Immigration and intermarriage among Hispanics: Crossing racial and generational boundaries. Sociological Forum, 26, 241-264. DOI: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01239
Lievens, J. (1997). Kenmerken van gezinsvormende migratie. In: R. Lesthaeghe (Ed.), Diversiteit in sociale verandering: Turkse en Marokkaanse vrouwen in België (pp. 73-104). Brussels: VUB Press.
Lievens, J. (1998). Interethnic marriage: Bringing in the context through multilevel modeling. European Journal of Population, 14, 117-155. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006075325546
Lievens, J. (1999). Family-forming migration from Turkey and Morocco to Belgium: The demand for marriage partners from the countries of origin. International Migration Review, 33(3), 717-744. DOI: 10.2307/2547532
Lievens, J. (2000). The third wave of immigration from Turkey and Morocco: Determinants and characteristics. In: R. Lesthaeghe (Ed.), Communities and generations – Turkish and Moroccan populations in Belgium (pp. 95-128). Brussels: VUB Press.
Losango-Nzinga, J. D. (2008). How do transnational networks facilitate the movement of Congolese migrants and refugees into Johannesburg. Master's thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
Lucassen, L. & Laarman, C. (2009). Immigration, intermarriage and the changing face of Europe in the post war period. History of the Family, 14(1), 52-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.hisfam.2008.12.001
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. & Cook, J.M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(2001), 415–444. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Myria, Federaal Migratiecentrum (2015). Migratie in cijfers en in rechten 2015.
Pagnini, D.L. & Morgan, S.P. (1990). Intermarriage and Social Distance among U.S.Immigrants at the Turn of the Century. American Journal of Sociology, 96(2), 405-432. DOI: 10.1086/229534
Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173-185. DOI: 10.1177/0146167297232006
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 65-85. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
Reniers, G. (1999). On the history and selectivity of Turkish and Moroccan migration to Belgium. International Migration, 37(4), 679-713. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2435.00090
Reniers, G., & Lievens, J. (1997). Stereotypen in perspectief. De evolutie van enkele aspecten van het huwelijk bij de Turkse en Marokkaanse minderheden in België. Migrantenstudies, 15(1), 28-44. Handle: 1854/LU-121334
Rhoades, S. A. (1993). The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 79(3), 188-189.
Schoonvaere, Q. (2014). België-Marokko: 50 jaar migratie. Demografische studie over de populatie van Marokkaanse herkomst in België. Nota. Federaal Migratie Centrum.
Schoonvaere, Q. (2013). Demografische studie over de populatie van Turkse herkomst in België. Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding & Centre de recherche en démographie et société (DEMO).
Schoonvaere, Q. (2010). Studie over de Congolese migratie en de impact ervan op de Congolese aanwezigheid in België: Analyse van de voornaamste demografische gegevens. Instituut IACCHOS (UCL) en Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding.
Song, M. (2009). Is intermarriage a good indicator of integration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35, 331-348. DOI: 10.1080/13691830802586476
Stegmueller, D. (2013). How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of frequentist and bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 748-761. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12001
Stora, B. (1991). Histoire de l'Algérie coloniale 1830-1954. Paris: La Découverte.
Sumata, C. (2007). Migradollars and poverty alleviation strategy issues in Congo (DRC). Review of African Political Economy, 29(93-94), 619-628. DOI: 10.1080/03056240208704646
Surkyn, E. (2000). Social integration of ethnic minorities: Indicators at the family level. In: R. Lesthaeghe (Ed.), Communities and generations – Turkish and Moroccan populations in Belgium (pp.165-194). Brussels: VUB Press.
Surkyn, E. & Reniers, G. (1997). Selecte gezelschappen. Over de migratiegeschiedenis en de interne dynamiek van migratieprocessen. In: R. Lesthaeghe (Ed.), Diversiteit in sociale verandering: Turkse en Marokkaanse vrouwen in België (pp. 41-72). Brussels: VUB Press.
Swyngedouw, E. & Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The Congolese diaspora in Brussels and hybrid identity formation: multi-scalar identity and cosmopolitan citizenship. Urban Research and Practice, 2 (1), 68-90. DOI: 10.1080/17535060902727074
Teule, J., Vanderwaeren, E. & Mbah-Fongkimeh, A. (2012). Marriage migration from Emirdağ to Brussels. King Baudouin Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.kbs-frb.be
Tribalat, M. (1995). Faire France. Une grande enquête sur les immigrés et leurs enfants. Paris: La Découverte.
Van der Bracht, K., Van de Putte, B. & Verhaeghe, P.-P. (2013). God bless our children? The role of generation, discrimination and religious context for migrants' religion in Europe. International Migration, 51(3), 23-27. DOI: 10.1111/imig.12075
Vandezande, V., Phalet K. & Swyngedouw M. (2011). Do feelings of discrimination explain the riots in Brussels? A comparison of Moroccan and Turkish groups in Brussels and Antwerp. Brussels Studies, 47, 1-14. Retrieved from: https://soc.kuleuven.be/web/files/6/34/EN_134_BruS47EN.pdf
Van Kerckem, K., Van de Putte, B. & Stevens, P. A. J. (2013). On becoming "too Belgian". A comparative study of ethnic conformity pressure through the city-as-context approach. City and Community, 12(4), 335-360. DOI: 10.1111/cico.12041
Van Kerckem, K., Van der Bracht, K., Stevens, P. A. J. & Van de Putte, B. (2013). Transnational marriages on the decline: Explaining changing trends in partner choice among Turkish Belgians. International Migration Review, 47(4), 1006-1038. DOI: 10.1111/imre.12053
Van Heelsum, A. & Hessels, T. (2006). Afrikanen uit Angola, DR Congo, Ethiopië, Eritrea, Nigeria en Sudan in Nederland; een profiel. Den Haag: Ministerie van Justitie.
Van Tubergen, F. & Maas, I. (2006). Ethnic intermarriage among immigrants in the Netherlands: An analysis of population data. Social science research, 36(3), 1065-1086. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.09.003
Van Zantvliet, P. I., Kalmijn, M., & Verbakel, E. (2014). Parental involvement in partner choice: The case of Turks and Moroccans in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 30(3), 387-398. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcu045
Verhaeghe, P., Van der Bracht, K. & Van de Putte, B. (2012). 'Migrant zkt toekomst': Op een keerpunt tussen oude en nieuwe migratie. Antwperen: Garant.
Viaene, V., Van Reybrouck, D. & Ceuppens, B. (2009). Congo in België. Koloniale cultuur in de Metropool. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.
Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Waters, M. C. & Jiménez, T. R. (2005). Assessing immigrant assimilation: New empirical and theoretical challenges. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 105-125. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100026
Zeleza, P. T (2002). African Migrations in a global context. African Issues, 30(1), 9-14. DOI: 10.1017/S1548450500006235
